12.01.2009

Christ....mas

A Christmas Note from last year...

So it’s about time for Christmas…….and hopefully we’re all fairly excited! I know I am. I can’t wait to see my family. I mean, who’s been harassing my sisters the past months? Their husbands? Probably. (I know those are fragmented sentences. It’s for style.)

So I can’t recall if I’ve posted this before (big shocker to those of you who know me) but a few months ago, while I was teaching my students about the life of Jesus. I took some time, a few hours really, to study his birth. There are things that we get wrong with the Christmas story that we do know….Mary is never mentioned riding a donkey, the number of Wise men isn’t know and they weren’t there at the time of his birth, etc. But I found something out that to me was even more startling. So in the words of Kevin in Home Alone, “This is it. Don’t get scared now.”

Firstly, we should realize that the gospels do not say that Mary went into labor immediately or after a short period of time after she and Joseph arrived in Bethlehem. Instead Jesus’ birth occurred simply, “while they were there.”

In Luke 2:7 we read, “and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.” Now, as it turns out the word for inn, kataluma, can be translated guest room, house or inn. Bethlehem was a very small town, and most commercial inns would be found in major towns with major roads. When Luke wants to refer to one of these inns, he uses the proper term for it, pandacheion. When kataluma is used in both Luke and Mark, it clearly refers to a “guest room” (Mk. 14:14; Lk. 22:11).

How could Jesus be born in a manger in a guest room? Well, the answer is the design of Ancient Near Eastern homes. Often times, the manger was located within the house itself. The home consisted of one large room in which the family would sleep on the upper level and the animals would sleep on a lower level. This was done to prevent theft, most likely (Mom, “Hey Jacob, your room looks like a pig’s sty.” Jacob, “It is.”).

So the most accurate portrayal of the Christmas story according to the sources is this. Mary and Joseph go to Bethlehem and stay at a house crowded with friends or family. Sometime after they arrive there, Mary gives birth (with a lot of people around to help) and they lay Jesus in a manger because it is the most convenient place. The guest room is super crowded. And newborn babies as well as new mom’s are tired, cranky, and so forth.

So what’s the point? Well, to me this view of the Christmas story takes out a lot of the drama on the one hand. But on the other hand it doesn’t. It places it solely where it belongs, upon the baby and coming of Jesus.

I was talking to my youth kids at our Christmas party the other night. Since they already knew this aspect of the story of Christ’s birth from our previous discussions, I focused instead on something that I had never quite understood. (If you’re not bored by this point, then feel free to read some more!)

In birth, and in Mary’s birth, women suffer pain and even injury or death because of the stain of sin (Gen.3:16). But at the end of the birth process, joy and new life have come. Often times, this joy is said to overcome the very pain that the woman is feeling at that time.

Fast forward around thirty-something years and now we have Jesus on a cross, going through pain, to produce new life for all. And after his death, there are tombs being shattered and bodies being raised to life (Mt. 27:52).

At Christmas we celebrate Christ, and by his birth we see the gospel. We see the gospel that covered all of his life, and covers it still. And it is the gospel that covers our lives as well, whether in birth, suffering, or death, until we are raised upon his return.

That’s all I’ve got. Merry Christ……..mas.

11.16.2009

Richard Dawkins' Evolutionary Hero and the "Devil's Chaplain": Chapter One

Richard Dawkins who like Darwin calls himself the "devil's chaplain" is at it again. In his last book, "The God Delusion" Dawkins set out to prove once and for all that God does not exist.

Although "The God Delusion" was well received by his fan base, atheist and theistic philosophers and theologians were unimpressed by what was largely nothing more than raving rhetoric. His arguments read more like a temper tantrum for grown-ups.

Having failed to persuade philosophers and theologians of his argumentative prowess, Dawkins is now back to writing in his own field. In "The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution" Dawkins is out to prove that evolution is once and for all true. So, I'm out with an open mind ready to assess the evidence.

In chapter one, Dawkins uses the old illustration of domestic dog breeding to show us that changes can occur within the gene pool of a species. O.k., so changes do occur within a species. We breed cows for more beef or milk. We breed dogs to be fighters or small and annoying barkers.

One is left to wonder however, when have we ever made a dog into a rabbit? Or when did a dinosaur become a bird? Changes occur within species, but do new species of animals come out of a species? Dawkins promises to show the answer is, "Yes." We'll see Richard, we'll see.

11.13.2009

A Sermon Preached on November 1, 2009

“The State of the Union”

1 Cor. 6:12-20

If you would, please turn with me to Paul’s first epistle to the Corinthians. Our attention today will be upon the words found in chapter six, verses twelve to twenty. The subject I would like to address is, “The State of the Union.” Again, the subject is “The State of The Union.” Would you please stand for the reading of God’s Word?

1 Corinthians 6:12-20
NIV 1 Corinthians 6:12 "Everything is permissible for me"-- but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"-- but I will not be mastered by anything. 13 "Food for the stomach and the stomach for food"-- but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14 By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also. 15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16 Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, "The two will become one flesh." {16 Gen. 2:24} 17 But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit. 18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body. 19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; 20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.


Tonight I am going to discuss with you what the Bible has to say about the nature of sexual immorality. This is a hard discussion. The abuse and misuse of sexuality has affected us all in some way. But to ignore a disease or a wound will never lead to healing. Sometimes, the hard task of scrubbing out the infection must be done. And it must be done by Christ through his Word. We all feel the pain in ourselves and each other. I feel yours as well as my own. But we must allow the salve of the Word of God to do its work.

The point of the passage and therefore the point of tonight’s message is not simply to say that sexual immorality is bad or sin. Although we need this reminder, this is not all that the Word of God is saying here. In the first letter to the Corinthians, God tells us through his apostle Paul why sexual immorality is sin. In other words, Paul does not merely write to the Corinthians in order to “call a spade a spade” but to show them why it is a spade in the first place.

As we look around at the state of sexuality in America, we find ourselves overwhelmed immediately with the magnitude of the situation. Just last week a fifteen year old girl attending her homecoming in Virginia was raped by at least ten young boys, (I say boys because these are NOT men, a man is only a man if God says that he is, and this has nothing to do with one’s gender but their character) with ten more boys standing idly by as spectators.

Nobody knew that this happened until she was discovered several hours later in critical condition. Her body was under the bleachers. Although she survived, it is certain that some part of that precious daughter of God died. And I hope those responsible are found and judged. They will be in the next life, if not in this life.

Also this week, the discussion of “gay rights” continued to progress as the Byrd-Sheppard measure, which was attached to the Pentagon’s budget was passed by the Senate. This measure officially makes “sexual orientation” a hate crime and discrimination against homosexuals prosecuted as a federal offense. From bills to the never-ending saga of John and Kate, sex and sexuality is in the news. And the reason is clear.

Ravi Zacharias has said, “The Biblical perspective is that all mean are equal, but that all truths are not. We have this reversed. Today all truths are equal and man is given ultimate priority.”
This reversal of truths has and will have many implications for our society.

But perhaps the fundamental outworking of this elevation of mankind can be seen in no area as clearly as that of sexuality. After all, what could be more self-centered than sex?

While we would all not mind spending the night lashing out at our culture, our leaders and other influences in the discussion of sexuality, God will not allow his people to do so. This is not only because the church is supposed to be an offensive cause of change, but because we who claim to be the people of God are no better than those we ridicule.

90% of men in America look at online pornography on a semi-regular basis. The percentage among men in the church is the same. Around one third of women are now addicted to pornography and that number is rising. Those who are not addicted to pornography are often times readers of “Romance novels”. These are merely, “pornographic novels” for women which create unreal expectations for themselves and for the men in their lives. The rate of abuse of these materials among Christians and non-believers is the same.

Sexual activity among Evangelical teenagers is the same IF NOT HIGHER than their supposedly “secular” counterparts. This year at Super Summer many of our students were surprised to learn in an anonymous poll taken of those in attendance, that one in five female Super Summer attendees had “experimented” at some point in time with other females. Super Summer is supposed to be a camp for our future Christian leaders.

Christian adults are now single well into their late twenties and the discussion among them has begun to focus on “technical virginity.” For the focus of many single adults the point is not about sexual purity, but about doing every other act but not having sex.

Marriage has been devalued. The term “trial marriage” has become popular among young adults. This phrase is used to describe the view that marriage is really more like dating than a life-long commitment. People enter into marriages not in order to stay “til’ death do us part”, but until “you don’t or can’t fulfill my heart.” In other words, I’ll love you until I’m tired of you. The divorce rate among married Christians is again, the same as those who are not Christians. The reasons for divorce are the same among Christians and non-Christians.

Now, let us return to the Corinthian church. For all of the vices, fear, and rapid decline of sexuality in our society, we are not yet as bad as those in Greco-Roman society. The Greek author Demosthenes wrote, “Mistresses we keep for our sake of pleasure, concubines for the daily care of the body, but wives to bear us legitimate children.” Paul’s own converts were first generation Christians.

They had no sense of prior Christian morals in the world in which they existed. Rather as we find in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, some of these converts were former homosexual prostitutes, homosexuals, and fornicators. Before Paul came preaching the Word of God, they were all involved in all sorts of immorality. After all, prostitution was common not only in social life, but in their temple worship.

The problem is that Paul writes, “Such were” some of them. So after hearing the gospel, how could these Corinthians continue to justify their immorality? We find their excuses in verses 12-13. Their first excuse is “all things are lawful for me.” These believers have taken the gospel to mean forgiveness of all sins, even the ones they were to commit. They could commit themselves to condemnable acts because they were condemned no longer. Paul’s response is two fold.

In his first response Paul writes, “but not all things are profitable.” Some interpreters translate the word “profitable” as “beneficial.” This response by Paul serves to notify the Corinthians of two things. First, freedom to do all things can result in harm to the individual or to a group of persons. Imagine a society without a law, what would that society be like? Undoubtedly, it would be a society in that which is “good” or “beneficial” is merely left up to an individual’s desire.

In an interview conducted in the year 2000, Peter Singer, professor of Philosophy at Princeton University carries this view of “good” to the extreme.

Reason: Would you require the death of a defective infant because other hypothetical babies would not be born who might lead more fulfilled lives?

Singer: No. My position is that the parents ought to be able to choose this. [Requiring the death of a defective infant] probably wouldn't increase overall happiness, if the parents wanted their child to stay alive. Parents have a very strong desire for their children, so it's hard to imagine.

Reason: But maybe they're wrong. They've misjudged.

Singer: Well, they may be wrong, but if they're going to suffer acutely for a long time over it, it's unlikely I think that the suffering of the child is going to be so great and so impossible to relieve that it will outweigh that. So that's why I would not require it. I could not imagine a society that would function well if it did require that, if it did take that decision from parents. I can imagine some very bizarre cases-if this child really had some condition [such that it] was just going to suffer excruciatingly and the parents nevertheless wanted it kept alive due to religious ideology. I would hope that the doctor would do something so the child didn't live and maybe say to the parents, "Unfortunately it died." But I wouldn't want to make that a matter of general social policy.

If all things are lawful, then freedom ends up in harm. There must be authority for “good” to exist.

Paul’s second response to the Corinthians statement that “all things are lawful” turns their slogan upon their head. Paul tells them that he will “not be enslaved by anything.” In short, not only does freedom to do all things result in evil, but it results in slavery. The one who desires no morality is in fact slave to his own self. Or he will become a slave to the consequences of his sin.

Freedom MUST BE GIVEN. One can not claim to have a part in the kingdom of God, and have nothing to do with the king. This one is really a slave to Satan, only he does not recognize his slavery, which makes it much worse.

Not only do the Corinthians participate in immoral behavior because of their problem with authority, but because of a wrong view of the body’s role in salvation. Their second saying is found in 6:13 “Food is for the stomach and the stomach for food, but God will do away with one and the other.” (Your quotations might be different, but that is because original Greek manuscripts did not have punctuation, it is my belief that this whole saying belongs to the Corinthians.)

The word for “stomach” is kolia. This refers to the entire digestive system, not merely the stomach. Another way of putting the Corinthians slogan would be, “Food is for the digestive system, and the digestive system is for food, and just as food is destroyed by being tuned into waste, so will our bodies be destroyed.”

Paul’s response to this is simple, that the body for the believer has a purpose. You can not separate the soul from the body in terms of behavior.

The Christian hope is not some dis-embodied state where we float around as “spirits” but that our bodies will someday be raised when Christ returns (6:14)! You can not commit sexual immorality on the view that what you do with your body does not matter! What you do with the body is all that matters! After all, are not the actions of the body a result of what you believe in your “soul”? Did not Christ call us to take up our cross and follow Him? Did He not call us to “death”? Is it the "sou"l of a person that is supposed to die, or the entire person?

“The body is meant for the Lord and the Lord for the body” (1 Cor. 6:13b).
After responding to the two Corinthian sayings, Paul then offers up his own argument for abstaining from sexual immorality. He does this by asking three questions beginning with the words, “Do you not know that”.

His first question occurs in v. 15, “Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ?” Translators have struggled with the word “members.” This word seems to have a focus here on the individual. And in America, we like to think about our own “individual walk with Christ.” But the Biblical perspective is that all of us who “walk with Christ” do so as a group. We are HIS BODY!

Instead, some translators have translated the verse as follows, “Do you not know that your bodies are limbs and parts of Christ? Shall I then take the limbs and parts of Christ and join them with a prostitute?” This can never be the case! It is an unholy union. That somebody would take Christ and have him be part in sexual immorality is an absurdity!

Now, some Bible commentators disagree as to what type of immorality is going on here. Is it that the Corinthians are visiting social prostitutes or temple prostitutes? But I believe that asking a question to which there may be no answer only serves to miss the point. Prostitution is not the ONLY case in which this principle applies.

I am sure that many of you have heard the story about the young woman who was sitting on a plane. She was riding in first class. The gentleman beside her was good-looking, he had been very kind, and you could tell from his shoes to his haircut that he had money. When the plane landed, the man leaned over to the young woman and asked, “Would you sleep with me for one-million dollars?”

At first the woman was shocked, and slapped the man. Then she began to think it over. It was just a one-time act. She had a sick mother and as a single mother, needed to take care of her kids. Finally, after several minutes the woman looked at the man and replied, “Yes.” The man looked backed at her and asked, “Would you be willing to sleep with me for free?” “No, replied the woman, what sort of person do you take me for.” The man smiled and replied, “We’ve already established what type of woman you are, now we’re just talking price.” The specific situation is not the issue, but her character.

I understand the need for grace, but we must also understand the seriousness of sexual immorality. Recently, a young man who was being questioned about his sexually immoral behavior said, “I don’t feel guilty about it. Jesus wouldn’t want me to feel guilty, maybe sad, but not guilty!” What a selfish view of sin and grace this poor young man has! Immorality is not about its affect upon the individual primarily, but about its effect upon Christ!

Paul reflects this idea by his words “by no mean”! This is not only a crying out by Paul at his very core, but a cry of a prayer! Paul’s own heart is stricken by the thought. Sexual purity is not about abstinence for the sake of not getting an STD or becoming pregnant. For the believer, sexual purity is about reflecting the purity of Christ.

Paul’s second question is found in verse 16 when he asks, “Do you not know that he who joins himself with a prostitute is one body with her?” To support this question he quotes Genesis 2:24 which states, “the two shall become one flesh.” In our modern minds with our referenced Bibles I believe we have missed out on what Paul is saying. It was common practice for a Pharisee to quote a phrase from the Old Testament in order to allude to the context as a whole. In other words, when Paul quotes “the two shall become one flesh” he is not merely using a euphemism for sex, but is referring to the entire context around that verse.

Is it possible that Paul is referring to marriage? Does sex itself constitute a marriage bond? But what is marriage?

According to Stanley J. Grenz in his book, Sexual Ethics: An Evangelical Perspective most Christians do not think past the fact that marriage is not marriage simply because the State deems it to be so. Marriage is not about the signing of the marriage license, when God placed Adam and Eve together in the garden. Neither is marriage about having a ceremony with a pastor exchanging vows in public. In the beginning marriage was based upon two things: commitment and the intimacy of a sexual union.
So is Paul stating that sexual union can result in marriage? I believe here, the answer is no. But I also do believe that Paul is stating that a bond is created. And that if one engages in sexual immorality with commitment in mind, that person is married whether or not he or she has had an official “wedding.” He uses the metaphor of our bond with Christ to parallel the bond formed during sexual intercourse.

This must be taught to our people today. The fleeting affair and the one-night stand are not “one and done” events. I believe that is why Paul states that “every other sin a man commits is outside of his body.” In other words, every other sin when stopped can be let go of and many of the consequences undone. But the bond of a sexual union is permanent and lasting, and while God forgives those caught up in such sin the effect remains.

Finally, Paul gives his third and final argument in 6:19 when he asks, “Do you all not know that the body of you all is the temple of Holy Spirit which is in you all….”. Notice that the address here to the community as a whole and not to the individual only. While the individual must abstain from sexual immorality, it is my belief that here Paul is saying that the effects of sin is not felt only by the believer, but by the entire community of believers.

Again, we are Americans and we want to “Just do it” or “Have it our way”. We have been taught individual responsibility and reward. But in scripture groups of people were often punished for the sin of an individual. In 2 Samuel 24:1 and 1 Chr. 21, David decides to take a census, but is only David punished? No, the whole nation is made to suffer. Also, for the sin of Korah in Number 16, God not only killed Korah, but consumed his entire house for his wrong doing. The effect of sin is not only individual but communal.

Sexual immorality not only profanes Christ, hurts the individual, and creates a permanent bond, but it affects the entire body of believers. There is no room for unrepentant, continual sexual immorality for the people of God.

So what is to be done? How are the Corinthians instructed and encouraged to stop this behavior? In 6:20 Paul as a faithful shepherd of Christ’s flock reminds them, “You are not your own, you were bought with a price.” This first thing that all of us must do is to remember the price paid for our freedom.

The Corinthians had an issue with authority, and that issue of authority is the root cause of sin in all of scripture. When we forget the character of the God we serve, we go and chase after other things. When we forget His supreme value we desire the valueless “stuff” of this life. But when we stop to consider the price how could we rebel against such love?

The Corinthian church had a better understanding about this than we do. In their time they saw slaves bought and sold. Some slaves had cruel and hard masters. They could be killed at any moment for any cause. How happy then was that slave who was bought and paid for by a loving and good master?

People are either under the slavery to Satan or Christ. They are either slave to their own passions or to His Passion. When we teach people to rebuke sin by simply changing the way they think we are setting them up for failure. We came to Christ because we could NOT overcome the chains of sin on our own.

Instead we should teach and encourage each other to overcome sin by knowing the goodness of our Lord. By setting Him at the front lines of our lives the battle for holiness can slowly begin to be won.

When we do this, then are we able to “glorify God in” our bodies. When we speak of the gory of God we speak of his unimaginable character which manifests itself in pure light. And when we glorify God in our personal lives we reflect that light into the darkness of a dying world. This is what we who are “created in His image” are made to do. It is our purpose. And only the subject who is fulfilling the desires of His King can be truly happy.

Brothers I do not know where you are in your walk with Christ. I do not know what effects sexual immorality has had upon your lives or in your congregations. But I do know that “such were some” of these Corinthians.

Finally I would like to end this sermon by going to 1 Cor. 1:4-9 where Paul began.

Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. I thank my God always concerning you, for the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus, 5 that in everything you were enriched in Him, in all speech and all knowledge, even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, who shall also confirm you to the end, blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. God is faithful, through whom you were called into fellowship with His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.

10.10.2009

Jesus: Opposed to Capitalism?

Michael Moore is on the attack again.  This time his victim is the nasty, greedy, capitalism of our evil nation.  For Michael Moore, capitalism is one of the greatest evils of all time.  In his movie he marches around with a megaphone to condemn the atrocities (usually rightfully so) committed by big businesses. He even uses the voice of Christ to drive home his point about money.  So, was Jesus against capitalism?

Pastors are often heard saying, "Jesus spoke on money more than any other topic."  This is said I assume to cause us to believe that Jesus thought money was of greater importance than other things.  First of all, the number of times a subject is brought up by Christ does not determine its importance.  I would consider his crucifixion and resurrection more important than money.  Secondly, I disagree entirely.  Jesus spoke about God more than any other topic, and when he spoke of money it was God's view of money.

About all that Jesus says about money is that it can be a source of evil, a deterrent to discipleship, and that one should pay taxes if the government requires it of you.  He never promotes a system or denies one.  To say that Jesus was communist or that he was capitalistic is like me saying "I promote free trade commu-capatilisticism.....when it exists 1500 years from now."    These systems were not in existence at that time, and hence not a part of his thinking.

The good part of Michael Moore's documentary/movie is that it does point out abuses of our capitalistic system.  The cheating of somebody out of their property or the abuse of banks and governments upon the individual is outrageous.  Jesus would confirm this, and as Christians so should we.

However, where Moore's logic takes a horrible turn is in this principle.  Bad people abuse capitalism, therefore capitalism is bad.  No Mr. Moore, bad people abuse capitalism, but that does not make it a bad system.

The virtue of capitalism is this, freedom.  It is freedom that is supposed to grant the individual power against abuses by the government.  It is freedom that allows the individual in a free-market society to purchase or not purchase what he or she desires.  It is freedom that allows the individual to better themselves, or to be lazy and worsen their situation.  Our Constitution sets up our powers to be equal players in order to protect the freedom of the individual.

The problem with socialism is that it grants power to one set of persons, the state.  And unless those in power are men and women of virtue (I would argue Christian men and women) then an evil state will have all power over all material goods.  To whom should we give this power?  To you Mr. Moore?  Who is good enough to ensure the best use of all resources for all people?  I don't trust Michale Moore, and I wouldn't trust myself.  There is no freedom in socialism, only slavery.  Didn't the world already learn that lesson?

If Mr. Moore's movie proves anything it proves this, that if capitalism is corrupt then socialism would never work.  Could you imagine, Mr. Moore, a society in which the government you claim has abused our material freedom did not allow us any material freedoms at all?  Mr. Moore, you are a millionaire, would you be so kind as to live as a beggar in order to promote the kind of society that you so envision?  Would you even be a millionaire except for the fact that you live in a capitalistic society, and a society in which freedom (of expression included) is allowed?  I would think not.

Thank you Mr. Moore for showing us that our freedoms are at risk from a corrupt society.  And thank you for answering your question.  We are a society that needs moral people.  We need ethical government, not more government.  We need ethical capitalism, not socialism.  We need morality.  And true morality can only come from God.  I believe God in Christ.  Which is what Jesus said about money, that you must view both it and  yourself as God's property.  Exercise your freedom to chose to follow Christ and his model of living, then I guarantee you that capitalism and our society will succeed.

10.07.2009

Student Calendar '09 to '10


‘09

Oct.
4 Parents Meeting
14 Small Group & SS Meeting
18 Photo Scavenger Hunt
20 Youth Guys Serve @ LAF

Nov.
22 Turkey Bowling/Bonfire

Dec.
4-5 Youth Campout
6  Parents Meeting
9 Small Group & SS Meeting
13 Christmas Party – 5-7 @ FAC
31 New Year’s Party


2010
Jan.
5 Student Back to School
15-17 D-Now
24  Bigger and Better Challenge 5-7 @ FAC

Feb.
7 Super Bowl Party
14 Parents Meeting
17 Small Group & SS Meeting

March.
7 Mission Trip Meeting
12 WFISD Weather Day
15-19 Spring Break – Mission Trip to Boston

April
2 Good Friday
4 Easter Sunday
9-10 Bible Drill Semi-Final in Dallas
11 Parents’ Meeting
14 Small Group & SS Meeting
18 Paintball 3-6:30 @ Field of Honor
23-24 Bible Drill Final in Arlington/Six Flags

May
16 Mud Madness
23 Senior Banquet
29 Graduation

June
2 Camp Volunteer Meeting
6 Parents’ Meeting
9  Small Group and SS Meeting
14-18 VBS
20 Falls Creek Meeting
28 July 2 – Falls Creek

July
12-16 Super Summer
30-31 SEC ’09 Frisco

August
1 Parents Meeting
2 Order New Logo and T-Shirts, Banners
4 SS & Small Group Meeting
15 Youth Banquet or Pool Party
22 Small Group Kickoff!

September
3-4 SS Teachers Retreat
17 Party 5-7 @ FAC


22  SYATP


October
3 Parents Meeting
17 Party 5-7 @ FAC



6 Small Group and SS Meeting

November
24-28 Thanksgiving Holiday
         Youth Campout

December
5 Parent’s Meeting
8 Small Group & SS Meeting
28-Jan. 1 – Ski Trip???

10.03.2009

Desiring God's Presence

Often times, we as the people of God experience a lack of God's presence.  While this might be due to our own sin, in other instances the absence of God occurs in the life of a believer who is walking faithfully with the Lord.  When that happens to us, what are we to do?

In Psalm 42.1-5, the writer of the Psalm expresses a yearning desire to be near to God.  Humans experience thirst, yet the Psalmist chooses to use the image of a deer.  In Hebrew, the yearning is one of movement.  The deer is not merely standing still, but he is turning his head and moving to where the water can be found.

The Psalm when read in its full historical context does not point to some inward spiritual conflict, but to the writer's actual problem of getting to the temple.  He wants to go to the temple to experience God's presence where he has known it before.

When we loose sight of God, we should not simply sit and focus on ourselves.

As Christians the Holy Spirit IS with us.  God's presence is always with us in a way more real than the author of this Psalm could imagine.  But simply attempting to revive the Spirit within us can lead to manipulate our own emotions or feelings.  Pretty soon, we equate knowing God's presence with a feeling or emotion.  And this leads to an unhealthy measure of God's presence in our lives.

Rather, when we do not feel God we should get up and go to where we have experienced God before.  We should visit places where we know God has been active in a movement among his people.  Once we arrive, I believe that we will realize that our experience of God's absence has been an experience of his presence.  Our missing Him has led us to Him once again.  And we will know even more surely that though our emotions fail, His love has never failed.

9.29.2009

Walking through Corinth: Suffering and Comfort

What is suffering?   How do we know when we suffer?  Does God cause us to suffer?  At some point in our lives, we all suffer.  As Christians we often come to God with many questions.  We ask the questions "Why?" or "What now?" or "Don't You love me?". But although we ask these questions, is this the Christian response?

After his initial greeting to the church at Corinth (2 Cor. 1:1-2), Paul does something different than he does in his other letters.   Instead of offering up a prayer of thanksgiving for the recipients, Paul writes a benediction ascribing praise to God (1:3-7).

Paul has just gone through a period of great suffering is Asia.  He writes to a group of believers in Corinth and tells them that "we despaired of life itself".  The "itself" gives emphasis to the very "utterly, unbearable" crushing (1:8) that caused Paul to call into question "life." 

First of all, we should remember Paul's suffering was for Christ.  That is, Paul is not here talking about suffering brought on by his own poor decisions or choices.  Although his suffering included physical aspects, he is not talking about a disease. Too many Christians complain of their "trials" which could have been avoided by living in God's will.  This is an offense to God, who should not be an excuse for our own action.  When Paul refers to suffering, it is suffering brought on by being a faithful apostle of Jesus.

Secondly, we should remember that Jesus foreknew Paul's suffering. In verse 1, Paul tells us that he was "called" to be an apostle.  At the time of Paul's calling, Jesus tells Ananias  that Paul will be shown how much he will suffer on behalf of Christ (Acts 9:13-16).  The suffering that Paul endured, and that made him despair of his life is therefore part of what Jesus had him into.  

Thirdly, we should be reminded that it is hard to label an even in our lives as "true suffering."  In order to label some event as a time of suffering, we must know what God is producing through that event right now. Secondly, we must know what God will eventually produce through that event in the future.  Both of these things are beyond our knowledge.

I often think of Joni Earekson Tada, the Christian quadriplegic.

Although after her accident that left her paralyzed Joni was suicidal, she is now one of the greatest lights for the message of the gospel in the kingdom of God.  And her "suffering" also produced in her greater Christian character.

Finally, we should find solace in the cross. Paul views his suffering not in light his own pain, but through the lens of the cross (1:5).  Jesus suffered not only the physical pain of the cross, but the weight of all sin.  Yet through His suffering, the greatest comfort the world has ever known has been given. 

Believers should approach suffering not in despair or defeat.  For how do you or I know that our suffering will not produce a greater good in ourselves or others for the glory of Christ?  Rather we should remember the resurrection of Christ (1:5) and the hope that we have of new life with him both now and in the future. 

Through the lens of the cross we can see comfort in all things.  And this comfort is from our Father who comforts us (1:4-5).   Let us share that comfort with others.  Let us return that comfort back to God as a true offering of worship.

9.22.2009

Walking through Corinth

2 Corinthians 1:1-2

    The letters of Paul most always follow the normal greeting found in the letters of his day.  This greeting consisted of 1) the name of the sender 2) the name of the recipient or recipients, and 3) a greeting or blessing. 
    This example can be found in many Greco-Roman letters such as the one composed in Acts 15 by the apostles.
   
    Paul does modify the greetings to his letter by adding his title (apostle), by mentioning Timothy and by substituting the word “grace” for greetings.  He keeps the Hebrew greeting shalom which is in Greek irene and translates as “peace.  This peace is that which is from God.

    Some scholars encourage readers not to be too caught up in the greeting of a letter, or to read to much into its details.  But there are many things here which the believer should notice.  The first is that Paul is not apostle by “choice” but apostle by “calling.”

    Apostles were those who had seen the risen Christ.  We are not apostles, or at least I am not, for I have not seen my risen Lord.  Whenever Paul thought of himself being called he was always no doubt brought to that startling moment when all that he had believed about himself, the world, and about God was proven to be false.
   
    The calling of Christ was none of Paul’s doing.  And as believers today, it is not to our own merit that we follow Christ, but rather to His glory.  The Christian should never think to his or herself, “I am saved, how wonderful am I!” but instead, “He saved me, he gave me even the faith to believe, how wonderful is He.”
   
    It is only by daily reminding of one's salvation that one can truly be humbled.  And it is only by humility, that one can be magnified through Christ.  We see our model of humbling and magnification in the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus. And this humble promotion through the blood of Christ by “grace” grants the believer true “peace.” Who can take away the peace which God gives, or can give peace that abides in the “One who was, and is, and is to come.” (Rev. 1:4)?


 
God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing. - C. S. Lewis

What is the Pupose of Living?

Student Newsletter for 09/22/09

Click here for our most recent Student Newsletter.

9.19.2009

Preaching: A Lost Art?

Although I am not "Reformed" in my theology, I do believe that the church is in need of reformation.  This is not a bold statement for many have thought so before me.  In truth, as long as the church is made up of Saints who are already saved yet being saved there will always be a need for reform.

One of the most astonishing areas in which the church needs reformation is in its proclamation of the word of God. That there is a lack of spiritual/doctrinal knowledge among the body of Christ can not be denied.  It is amazing how often even older Christians can not explain why they believe in baptism, what type of baptism it should be, or articulate even the basics of salvation or soteriology.

There is a lack of discipleship.  And it is a lack of discipleship in the Word of God.  We live in an age where more resources are available to the people of God than ever before.  Yet fewer unbelievers are being brought under the Lordship of Christ, and even fewer believers can share what that means.  We have at our disposal commentaries, lexicons, dictionaries, journals, and popular books.  There is no lack of media in our churches with moving backgrounds, still backgrounds, power points, and movies.

With the click of a mouse you can hear your favorite speaker or pastor's latest mp3 or read his sermons.

Yet men are no longer leaders of their homes or churches.  Wives and children, as well as others in our churches no longer know their roles according to God's Word.  I wonder if we have homes and churches made up of a bunch Christians instead of Christian homes and churches.

What would happen if in our churches on Sunday mornings, all pastors preached through the basic doctrines of the faith?  What if our pastors preached through the Bible verse by verse?  And what would happen if we expected those in our churches to know the Word and live it?  What would happen if we cut fellowship with them if they were unwilling to receive the truths of Scripture? 
 Christ commands such things in His Word.  And he was not unwilling to cut ties with those who would endanger the rest of the body. He commanded Paul to do such things. And Paul did them because he was more concerned about the Body of Christ than about the psyche of a few people, or about his own comfort among his people

What we need today are leader's in our churches who take people verse by verse through the Word of God.  They must take their people through books, and share God's ideas instead of their own ideas.  We need expository preaching not simply because it is Biblical, but to combat our own ignorance.

And we need better men of God, courageous men of God to speak His truth.  How can we bring persons to the God, whom we do not know ourselves?


NIV 1 Corinthians 9:16 "Yet when I preach the gospel, I cannot boast, for I am compelled to preach. Woe to me if I do not preach the gospel!"

9.17.2009

A Hard Saying of Jesus

On Wednesday nights, I have been taking students through The Hard Sayings of Jesus by F. F. Bruce.

Last night, we focused upon Christ's words in Mark 2:17, "Those who are well do not need a doctor, but those who are sick; I did not come to call the righteous but sinners."

I introduced the topic by showing the video "Skin (Sarah Beth)" by Rascal Flatts.  This video tells of a fear or an experience that we have all had, that of sickness. 

As a minister, and I suppose just as a result of growing older, I have come to despise cancer.  I have watched persons struggle with the disease.  And I have watched them die.  If I could do anything to cure cancer, I would.  I am sure that all of us would.

Now, what of the disease of sin?  The result of sin for us all is death (Rom. 6:23), but there are those of us who have been raised with Jesus who have no fear of the first or second death, hell (Rev. 2:11, 20:14).

We do not fear, because we have been to the doctor.  He has both healed us and given us a prescription to take before we will be healed fully.  We are saved and are being saved.

Now, will we not offer the cure to others?

Imagine if Jesus had simply sat in the synagogue, waiting for sinners to come inside?  It is interesting that this is often our plan, but when God was incarnate it was not his.

When Jesus associated with sinners, he did so in a very real way.  He sat down and ate with them.  He talked with them, shared food, laughed, and enjoyed their company.  It was only those who were religious who criticized him.  Matthew adds to Mark's saying by giving us Jesus' quote from Hosea 6:6.  "Go and learn what this means, 'I desire mercy, and not sacrifice.'".

Now not all of the religious persons were evil men.  Pharisees and their followers get a bad wrap.  Some of them no doubt truly had a heart for God and desired to please him.  But they had no heart for sinners.

I believe these words tell us today, "If you attend church every Sunday, if you lead in worship, if you are on a committee, if you are a deacon, or a minister, and you lose you heart for those in sin, then all of your other efforts are trivial."

I was glad at the end of our time together when our youth decided to break into their own groups and repent of their selfishness. Only the Holy Spirit could lead them to take that action.

Do you want to grow the body of Christ for the sake of Christ?  Then tell others about your favorite doctor.  The only One who brings true healing.

"Aim at heaven and you will get earth thrown in. Aim at earth and you get neither."- C. S. Lewis

9.16.2009

Polkinghorne on Science and God.......

I am not a scientist. But most scientists are not theologians, either.  Fortunately, in John Polkinghorne God has provided His kingdom with both!

In his book Quarks, Chaos, & Christianity Polkinghorne discusses the relationship between God and science.  Of course, from his perspective they are intricately interwoven.

Polkinghorne states that "The need to mix fact and interpretation, to survey the world from a chosen point of view, makes science more daring, and more precarious, than people often realize."

Later on he writes that he believes science "never succeeds in telling us the whole truth about the physical world - there are some new things to find out - but, surely, it tells us some of the truth."

To illustrate this Polkinghorne uses the example of a road map.  Scientifically, the map is merely a collection of atoms and molecules that make ink and paper.  But a map is more than than merely molecules and atoms.

In the same way, science can tell us that our bodies are made of quarks and gluons, but it can not tell us more than our physical properties or how they arrived.

Some modern atheists such as Dawkins, Hitchens, and others say that evolution has disproved God entirely.  These arguments should not even cause a moment's hesitation for the Christian.  Not only because evolution might not be the best possible explanation found by scientists in the future, but because this claim can not be postulated by science at all.

 The claim that "God does not exist" must be made on the basis of one's interpretation of the facts of science.  And this interpretation is subject to the criticisms of philosophy, theology, sociology, and other methods of knowing.

One can not look at a cake and say, "Ha, I have discovered the ingredients and formula for mixing the ingredients, therefore a baker never existed!"  You can not observe your cake, and lay theological claim to it as well.

9.14.2009

Forgiveness: Is It About Us?

Everybody desires forgiveness.  Forgiveness is necessary for maintaining relationships.  Even those who do not know or desire the forgiveness of God through Christ view forgiveness as necessary in their friendships, dating relationships, family relationships, and other areas of life.

But were we made to forgive or were we made to be forgiven?  If one holds that God is the Creator of the individual, then it seems that God creates the individual for his purposes.  And if God's greatest purpose in creating the individual is that the individual might know Him, then we must have been created to experience forgiveness. 

In the Old Testament we find that the Psalmist asks to be forgiven not for the sake of his self, but "for your name's sake", or for the sake of the Lord (Ps. 25.2; 79,9).  This theme is repeated in the prophets.

You see, when we follow the commands for Christ it is not out of a vain pursuit for our own holiness but for His.  It is love for Christ that motivates the believer to right living.   He says, "If you love me, you will obey what I command" (Jn. 14.15). 

That is how we know those who are in Christ.  They show love for Him and so they follow his desires and not their own for again, "No one who lives in Him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has either known him or seen him" (1 Jn. 3.6).

If our motivation for not failing Christ is out of love for Christ or Christ Himself, then is our motivation for forgiveness the same?  Do we ask forgiveness to appease our conscience or to ease or guilt, or in order that God might be glorified?  True forgiveness is for "his name's sake."

Jonathan

"If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world."
--C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

9.11.2009

Remembering 9/11/01

On September 11, 2001 I was a freshman at Ouachita Baptist University in Arkadelphia, AR. At that time, I was a music major with a vocal performance emphasis. I was at lunch in the cafeteria and a friend of mine, Brian Blocher walked in and said that a plane had crashed into the World Trade Center Buildings in New York.

My initial thought was that something like a Cessna or smaller had mistakenly crashed into the buildings. I though perhaps the pilot had a medical condition which caused him to make such an incredible error.

Towards the end of my lunch break I walked in to the Student Center and saw something completely different on the television. I watched as I saw people jumping out of the building. I was there a few minutes before the first building suddenly collapsed and fell.

It was like a dream, or a movie, except you felt the instantaneous loss of life. When I look upon this day I remember several things.

First of all, we were all reminded of the reality of evil. Secondly, we were all reminded of our humanity. We will not live forever.

Finally, we were reminded of love. The firefighters, police officials and others who were died that day did so for their fellow man. And greater love than this can not be found (Jn. 15:13).

This September 11th I choose to honor them. And thinking of their sacrifice I think of Christ. And thinking on Christ leads me to ask myself, would I give my life so that others might know him? Am I giving my life today?

9.08.2009

The Obama School Speech Controversy -- What to Think?

The Obama School Speech Controversy -- What to Think?

Shared via AddThis

Devotedly Yours

I want to make this blog a place where students and their parents can grow in "wisdom and stature and in favor with God and men." In order to do this, all growth must be founded upon God as known through Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, and as revealed in his word, the Bible. So, consider this post as a first in a series of devotional thoughts.

How much time did Jesus spend in "church"?

When I ask myself that question two things come to mind. First of all, as a Jew, Jesus did appear in the institutionalized "church" or synagogues of his day (mk 1.21, 3.1, 6,2; lk 4.16, 4.33, 6.6, 13.14, jn. 6.59; mt. 12.9, 13.54). He always seems to have cause quite a ruckus when he was there. This often led to him being kicked out of the synagogue. His life was threatened by what he said in a synagogue once (lk. 4.29-29).

When it came to the institution of the church, Jesus seems to have been a participant. But perhaps not the ones all of us would like for him to have been. Jesus cared more about the hearts of those in the institution then simply the institution itself. His involvement in the synagogues could be summarized with the words of YHWH, hence Jesus' words as well, found in Isaiah:

Isaiah 29:13 The Lord says: "These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men."


The second response I have to this question is that Jesus spent a lot of time "being" and teaching others to be the church as well. The church is his body, so wherever Jesus was, that was where the true people of God were. That was were the church truly was. Not in the synagogue, but with Christ.

Imagine if Jesus had spent all of his time in a synagogue merely having a teaching ministry. What would have happened after his resurrection?

Instead, he trained men on how to reach other men. He showed them how to care for the lost by caring for the lost. He showed them how to sacrifice by being the ultimate sacrifice. His life was the gospel that they would teach.

So, how much time did Jesus spend in "church"? Quite a lot, actually! But whether in our out of the synagogue, he was interested in "being" the "church". If we are not about doing, then we are not following Christ. And if we do not follow him, we are not his disciples.

5.27.2009

Apologetically Yours...

I'm a minister to students. I love my job. I love my job because I love my students. And I love my students because of who God has made them to be, for who they are.

The reality today is that many students in Jr. High, High School, and college are losing their faith. Student ministry isn't like it was even ten years ago. The lives of students are not like they were ten years ago.

Students are losing their faith in Jesus for several reasons, but among the most important is the fact that we do not do a good job of equipping them for life. This is because although we teach them how to regurgitate phrases such as "God loves you.", "lost", "sin", and "Savior", we do not teach them how to know truth.

There are a lot of things outside of your families and your homes competing for you. A lot of things that are said to be true. That Jesus is the Son of God, that He is God, that he lived to reveal who God was, died on a cross and rose from the dead is just one out of hundreds.

So, how do you know it is true?

I remember that it was not until I was 19 and in college when it first really dawned on me that I believed that Jesus was still alive. I was sitting in my bed reading "The Chronicles of Narnia" and I got to the part where Aslan the lion cracked the table and came back to life.

I just sat there saying, "Dead things don't raise from the dead." I said it over and over again. Me saying Jesus died and came back to life was crazy. It was almost like saying "Elvis lives".

How did I know that Jesus was alive? For that matter, how did I know that the Bible was true and that all of that stuff really happened? How do I find truth at all?

You might struggle with theses questions. Maybe you don't, but I gurantee you that others around you do. And some of them who don't believe in God wonder why you haven't thought of it before.

What would you say to someone who says, "Science proves that God doesn't exist." or "The Bible was made by a bunch of guys that wanted to start a new religion." or "How do you know Jesus rose from the dead?"

If you have ever had those questions.,I want to give you some things to say. There is evidence for belief in Jesus. There is a way of knowing what is true.

Jonathan

Student Newsletter 05/27//09